View Full Version : please, test and give me your opinion...
Virtualguide
10-12-2009, 11:48 AM
So, we have two links here, the same pano, the same everything - just pano.swf is ver. 2.3.1 here:
#1
http://virtualguide.sk/test/al1/
and ver. from 10/2007:
#2
http://virtualguide.sk/test/al2/
qualityMotion / Static is set to medium/high, the same for qualityMotion2 etc...
Look at the grass and tell me which one is better?
Significantly the latest one pano.swf (#1) is faster and eats significantly less CPU cca 35 vs 75 %... but according to my eye, I like the image produced by older one more...
What is your opinion? Do you have some advice how to improve the quality of projected image?
HansNyberg
10-12-2009, 12:43 PM
MY CPU on mac gives me 110% on both.
I also wonder if you have updated the autorotator to the new Flash 10 one.
I have not seen this difference actually I protested in the first place of using medium as default for Flash 10 as it did give bad panning for large display. However that is something I found out changed later for some reasons and I actually started to use even higher than medium for motion.
It might have happened some changes in the newer Flash 10 versions.
For small display like this I use qualityMotion2=best.
Hans
360VT.co.uk
10-12-2009, 01:22 PM
number 1, both CPU at 20%, image nice and smooth
number 2, both CPU at 70%, image not so smooth
prefer number 1 !!!
Virtualguide
10-12-2009, 01:50 PM
MY CPU on mac gives me 110% on both.
I also wonder if you have updated the autorotator to the new Flash 10 one.
Hans
U are true, I have the very old one ... :-)
which one is the last ?
seeinside360
10-12-2009, 01:51 PM
Older one is really better!
Virtualguide
10-12-2009, 01:56 PM
autorotator is from october 2007. I did not find any newer official file. Should I try the Nidrig's one?
Virtualguide
10-12-2009, 02:03 PM
Older one is really better!
ye, I think so also.
360VT however gives another opinion... hm. If I look at the grass I can see the difference and although the performance of #1 is better, #2 seems to me better in anti-aliasing ...
thanks to all fo testing + opinions
and i would like to ask others to test also.
Thank U very much!
360VT.co.uk
10-12-2009, 02:23 PM
sorry. I was moving it with my mouse and not the autorotator.
yes number 2 looks better, but number 1 moves smoother with the mouse
HansNyberg
10-12-2009, 03:12 PM
autorotator is from october 2007. I did not find any newer official file. Should I try the Nidrig's one?
Yes thats the one which supports the Flash 2 tags.
I believe there is a problem that the old one changes your settings to low even for the Flash 10 version.
Hans
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.